addleshaw goddard recently lost its amazing reputation and notwithstanding that addleshaw goddard now faces criminal charges involving perverting the course of justice, forgery, conspiracy to defraud and an abuse of process quite soon. this means the outcome will certainly involve addleshaw goddard coming under the public spotlight and all that follows public interest was recently triggered by news that addleshaw goddard learned of a new promotional online campaign
Addleshaw Goddard evidently bent the truth
they tampered with evidence, behaved fraudulently
causing Daniel Thwaites Plc to lose £180,000 claim
defendant Web4orce Limited lost over £580,000 and
Addleshaw Goddard's 6 lawyers, 2 partners were
shamed losing to an 85 year old litigant in person
what's more Addleshaw Goddard employed corrupt
tactics trying to achieve their target but forgot
the 85 year old is an internet whizzkid with balls
abuses of process are the final nails in the coffin
they deservedly are up to their necks in the sh*t
addleshaw goddard truly catastrophic problems
addleshaw goddard really ashamed of themselves
addleshaw goddard suffered significant damage
addleshaw goddard disgrace on display 4 all 2 c
addleshaw goddard public humiliation is obvious
addleshaw goddard no doubt themselves to blame
addleshaw goddard only protect their own asses
addleshaw goddard guilty party but can’t admit it
addleshaw goddard undoubtedly in real trouble
addleshaw goddard bosses heads stuck in sand
addleshaw goddard lots of unwanted publicity
addleshaw goddard skilled lawyers failed badly
addleshaw goddard assumes they are fireproof
addleshaw goddard publicly disgraced again
Addleshaw Goddard's Hall of Shame
It is worth noting that each of the lawyers listed below were employed by Addleshaw Goddard following their Letter before Claim in February 2023. They were a lot younger, better paid, better qualified and enjoy far superior mental capacity than their opponent an 85 year old Litigant in Person representing the Defendant and yet it's unforgivable that not one of them noticed Addleshaw Goddard was in abuse of process, behaved criminally including tampering with evidence, conspiracy to defraud, forgery and contempt of court.
(1) David Engel, Grade A Partner charged at £785.00 per hour
(2) Gareth Jones, Grade A Partner charged at £580.00 per hour
(3) Neil O'Sullivan, Grade C Senior London Associate charged at £550.00 per hour
(4) Steve Murphy, Grade B Managing Associate charged at £445.00 per hour
(5) Katie Derry, Grade B Managing Associate charged at £415.00 per hour
(6) Jayd Haigh, Grade C Senior Associate charged at £415.00 per hour
(7) James Damarell, Grade C Senior Associate charged at £415.00 per hour
(8) Craig Johnson, Grade C Associate charged at £370.00 per hour
(9) Emily Howard, Grade D Trainee Solicitor charged at £200.00 per hour
(10) Max O'Casey, Grade D Trainee Solicitor charged at £200.00 per hour
(11) Anna Gilchrist, Grade D Trainee Solicitor charged at £200.00 per hour
(12) Imogen Speight, Grade D Parelegal charged at £180.00 per hour
(13) Isabella Horobin, Grade D Parelegal charged at £180.00 per hour
(14) Warren Field,, Senior Court Manager charged at £550.00 per hour
(15) Susan Fox, Grade C Senior Costs Manager charged at £370.00 per hour
(16) Anya Cross, Grade C Costs Advisor charged at £270.00 per hour
Addleshaw Goddard Office Markers
To examine the map in fullscreen view - click on the white square icon in the top right corner of the map. In the event the red markers in the map are overlapping then click on the plus icon in the bottom right corner of the map until they are separated, click on the markers to discover Addleshaw Goddard office title, address, phone number, email / website links plus an image.
Addleshaw Goddard Reviews Form
If you have any reviews concerning Addleshaw Goddard and feel strongly enough to air your views please fill in this form and we will publish them in the Latest Reviews section below, and please be assured all reviews will be dealt with anonymously when requested.
Addleshaw Goddard Latest Reviews
Reviewed : 21 Apr 2026
Addleshaw Goddard Bad
Pros - Good insurance coverage for employees
Cons - Qualified lawyers in capital markets team are not well-trained and have no technical skills, and do not involve much in drafting. They pass all the work to non-qualified legal assistants.
Reviewed : 20 Apr 2026
None, apart from the ability to work from home!
Pros - Commutable Office - Big law firm - Good benefits like holidays, work from home, and etc
Cons - Poor training and onboarding - Lack of support from supervisor
Reviewed : 15 Apr 2026
Addleshaw Goddard high stress, little reward
Pros - Good name to have on your CV for legal experience, exposure to technical work as you have a fair bit of responsibility from the start
Cons - Extremely high pressure and little training making the job very stressful, unrealistic targets, hierarchical culture, little reward or recognition for your work, very underpaid paralegals with absolutely no guarantee or encouragement of progression.
Reviewed : 15 Apr 2026
Addleshaw Goddard very negative experience.
Pros - Nice offices, some lovely colleagues
Cons - Lack of training. Performance Management. Toxic negativity. IT Systems. Mental Health.
Reviewed : 14 Apr 2026
High stress, little reward or recognition.
Pros - Good name to have on your CV for legal experience, exposure to technical work as you have a fair bit of responsibility from the start
Cons - Extremely high pressure and little training making the job very stressful, unrealistic targets, hierarchical culture, little reward or recognition for your work, very underpaid paralegals with absolutely no guarantee or encouragement of progression.
Reviewed : 13 Apr 2026
Addleshaw Goddard middle of the road.
Pros - Some genuinely lovely people (including senior partner - CP)
Cons - Lazy and incompetent PAs who hold on to their jobs by flirting with the partners, convoluted support processes, misogynistic partners (particularly those in the middle and lower ranks), lack of firm identity.
Reviewed : 09 Apr 2026
Addleshaw Goddard Good Name, bad experience
Pros - Having AG on your CV can open up a lot of doors in the industry
Cons - As a paralegal, your line manager is unqualified and rarely has a detailed enough knowledge of the work you undertake to provide you with relevant guidance. Paralegals are often used as mass admin for projects rather than given opportunities to gain knowledge.
Reviewed : 25 Mar 2026
Addleshaw Goddard good Name, bad experience.
Pros - Having AG on your CV can open up a lot of doors in the industry. The Qualified Solicitors / Legal execs within the business are very knowledgeable and happy to answer any questions
Cons - As a paralegal, your line manager is unqualified and rarely has a detailed enough knowledge of the work you undertake to provide you with relevant guidance. Paralegals are often used as mass admin for projects rather than given opportunities to gain knowledge.
Reviewed : 17 Mar 2026
No diversity or progression at all.
Pros - Beautiful office, good location, has a canteen
Cons - Rude managers, no progression, lack of diversity in the TST department. They purposely hired ethnic minorities for temporary employment at the same time they did their diversity questionnaire.
Reviewed : 10 Mar 2026
Unhappy Paralegal at Addleshaw Goddard
Pros - Good work, great resources and some good perks (parties, subsidies etc)
Cons - Promotions process is not done fairly and you can face resistance from TST leadership team if you try to expand your experience/do what is best for you.
Reviewed : 09 Mar 2026
Addleshaw Goddard deeply unpleasant place to work.
Pros - Some genuinely interesting work if you're in the right place at the right time. Generally a nice bunch of co-workers
Cons - 1) 18k is the starting salary and is the salary you will likely stay on regardless of performance or billable hours. 2) senior paralegals typically earn around 22K and there is no clear progression route to get there. 3) Bonuses - don't be silly. you'd be lucky to get a few 100 whilst your friends in other industries are getting 10% bonuses and pay rises.
Reviewed : 28 Apr 2023
Treat your staff with respect.
Pros - Flexible working Salaries are on par Opportunities are available
Cons - Very Risk adverse. Segregation between Legal Tech and IT - they need to work together not apart. The firms needs to allow IT devise a technical strategy that underpins the capabilities of the firm, not Partners controlling.
evidently bent the truth and Search Engines
The following phrases are examples of what people type into search engines such as Ask, Bing, Google, Yahoo, Dogpile, DuckDuckGo, Wow and Yandex when searching for evidently bent the truth. To check them out click on your chosen search engine links below :